<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patrimony And Autonomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/03/patrimony-and-autonomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/03/patrimony-and-autonomy/</link>
	<description>Place. Limits. Liberty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/03/patrimony-and-autonomy/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=1118#comment-170</guid>
		<description>&quot;We don&#039;t need to bring in Christianity, Conservatism, or Patrimony to understand that. Gratefulness, affection and loyalty are not necessary to make your eminently reasonable point.&quot;

Aren&#039;t these specifically things necessary to accept the gifts of the past, keep them, and pass them on to others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t need to bring in Christianity, Conservatism, or Patrimony to understand that. Gratefulness, affection and loyalty are not necessary to make your eminently reasonable point.&#8221;</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t these specifically things necessary to accept the gifts of the past, keep them, and pass them on to others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben A.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/03/patrimony-and-autonomy/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=1118#comment-166</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re saying that we should learn from the past but reject unsustainable traditions?

We don&#039;t need to bring in Christianity, Conservatism, or Patrimony to understand that. Gratefulness, affection and loyalty are not necessary to make your eminently reasonable point.

I think we can get along as humans without invoking filial and tribal obligations at every turn in our politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re saying that we should learn from the past but reject unsustainable traditions?</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need to bring in Christianity, Conservatism, or Patrimony to understand that. Gratefulness, affection and loyalty are not necessary to make your eminently reasonable point.</p>
<p>I think we can get along as humans without invoking filial and tribal obligations at every turn in our politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/03/patrimony-and-autonomy/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=1118#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Avarachan, 

Where Larison says, &quot;This is how we are now, but this is not how we were created&quot; perhaps that holds your answer. Of course, there is the possibility that he is claiming that before the aboriginal catastrophe sexuality did not exist. When he says, &quot;none of us would be here at all had our first ancestors not disobeyed God&quot; he might be referring to the condition &lt;i&gt;here&lt;/i&gt; (not how we were created) though it is possible the emphasis is on &lt;i&gt;would not be&lt;/i&gt;. Larison?

I agree with the heart of this, though. We are flung into the world at a particular place in history, culture, and the cosmos. Claiming autonomy (which we never possess) is &quot;free riding&quot;, arrogant, and ungrateful. Everything we have is &lt;i&gt;inherited&lt;/i&gt;--good and bad, and as a gift, it should be received with corresponding gratitude. Liberalism treats history as a whore and moves on to the next with as much ingratitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avarachan, </p>
<p>Where Larison says, &#8220;This is how we are now, but this is not how we were created&#8221; perhaps that holds your answer. Of course, there is the possibility that he is claiming that before the aboriginal catastrophe sexuality did not exist. When he says, &#8220;none of us would be here at all had our first ancestors not disobeyed God&#8221; he might be referring to the condition <i>here</i> (not how we were created) though it is possible the emphasis is on <i>would not be</i>. Larison?</p>
<p>I agree with the heart of this, though. We are flung into the world at a particular place in history, culture, and the cosmos. Claiming autonomy (which we never possess) is &#8220;free riding&#8221;, arrogant, and ungrateful. Everything we have is <i>inherited</i>&#8211;good and bad, and as a gift, it should be received with corresponding gratitude. Liberalism treats history as a whore and moves on to the next with as much ingratitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avarachan</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/03/patrimony-and-autonomy/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Avarachan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=1118#comment-123</guid>
		<description>&quot;[I]ndeed ultimately none of us would be here at all had our first ancestors not disobeyed God[.]&quot;

Can you explain what you mean by this?

Thanks,
Avarachan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[I]ndeed ultimately none of us would be here at all had our first ancestors not disobeyed God[.]&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you explain what you mean by this?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Avarachan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

