<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tacit Dimension of Shop Class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/07/the-tacit-dimension-of-shop-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/07/the-tacit-dimension-of-shop-class/</link>
	<description>Place. Limits. Liberty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alethea</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/07/the-tacit-dimension-of-shop-class/#comment-8450</link>
		<dc:creator>Alethea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=4519#comment-8450</guid>
		<description>The whole idea of tradition ought to be more publicized among homeschoolers.  I learned well enough with books, but I never could have understood Kant or Kierkegaard (or Plato, for that matter) without your lectures and the discussion that came up during class.  Co-ops are a good thing for homeschooling--the student-driven, let&#039;s-go-look-in-a-book-and-find-out approach was probably necessary for the first generation of homeschoolers (at least those without access to master craftsmen/scholars who would approve of homeschooling).  Following generations have begun and ought to increase their involvement with people who know things.

Thanks for writing this piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole idea of tradition ought to be more publicized among homeschoolers.  I learned well enough with books, but I never could have understood Kant or Kierkegaard (or Plato, for that matter) without your lectures and the discussion that came up during class.  Co-ops are a good thing for homeschooling&#8211;the student-driven, let&#8217;s-go-look-in-a-book-and-find-out approach was probably necessary for the first generation of homeschoolers (at least those without access to master craftsmen/scholars who would approve of homeschooling).  Following generations have begun and ought to increase their involvement with people who know things.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing this piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purify Your Bride &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Reformation and the Nature of Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/07/the-tacit-dimension-of-shop-class/#comment-7998</link>
		<dc:creator>Purify Your Bride &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Reformation and the Nature of Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=4519#comment-7998</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting article linked in the comments of this thread. It talks about the nature of knowledge and specifically the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting article linked in the comments of this thread. It talks about the nature of knowledge and specifically the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.W. Sabin</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/07/the-tacit-dimension-of-shop-class/#comment-6588</link>
		<dc:creator>D.W. Sabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=4519#comment-6588</guid>
		<description>Reading a book on the Original Australians, I encountered an inadvertently humorous use of the descriptive term &quot;conservative&quot;. According to the author, the Aboriginals, communal foragers for countless millennia were the &quot;conservatives&quot; in relation to the &quot;liberal&quot; British penal colonist transplanting English common law and the ethic of property ownership into the ancient lands of an uncomprehending native. One of the most &quot;conservative&quot; groups were a clan of the Tasmanians who were surrounded by fish but refused to eat the most abundant food available in a land of scarcity because it was surmised that their forebears had become sickened by a fish borne disease in the remote past and they simply adopted the aversion as a tradition to keep. Numerous streams watered by storms tracking the roaring forties and they would choose an empty stomach over things fishy. 

The thought then occurs that those Front Porch Aboriginals such as myself who rail on about the current era&#039;s Technocratic Sunbeams for Leviathan might simply be dimwitted nostalgics, following some romantic and episodic eccentric urge rendered baseless by current circumstances. But then, we confront the current reminisces over  the Moon launch and recall the pride, wonder and awe of this monumental marriage of America&#039;s technological acumen with our love of challenge and exploration. The event was simultaneously mystical and coldly rational. Via camera, we walked with the explorer through the dusty antiquity of the blasted lunar landscape as though Columbus might have had an embedded reporter aboard the Santa Maria. We looked back homeward, with the astronauts at a small blue orb of watery life that is our home, rendered almost fragile as it floated in the dark vacuum of Space. At this moment of triumph when we were given our first look at the small orb of life alone in the black void, one would have thought that a union of Faith and Reason might have borne real advances. Unfortunately, while we might have felt the possibility, the mania for the modern continued it&#039;s confident march and the May Day Parade of the Victorious Technocrat proceeded apace. 

 Crawford&#039;s book speaks of the need to temper Technology with Tradition and reinvigorate the love and liberty inherent to craftsmanship. This is not so much a submission to a fear or blind obedience of authority as it is an embrace of the love for a stewarding authority. In one direction lies consigned surrender and in the other lies that marvelous combination of memory and possibility released by the formidable trinity of the mind, hand and spirit.

Aboriginal urges notwithstanding, painted up in white zig-zags and concentric circles while girding for the Jaguar Dance, I enjoy an occasional plane ride in that lounge chair at 35,000 feet as much as the next guy. Don&#039;t ask me to chose between dirt and a silicon wafer because this is a specious choice made for a vacuum that is not favored with this tiny blue orb, hurtling through space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading a book on the Original Australians, I encountered an inadvertently humorous use of the descriptive term &#8220;conservative&#8221;. According to the author, the Aboriginals, communal foragers for countless millennia were the &#8220;conservatives&#8221; in relation to the &#8220;liberal&#8221; British penal colonist transplanting English common law and the ethic of property ownership into the ancient lands of an uncomprehending native. One of the most &#8220;conservative&#8221; groups were a clan of the Tasmanians who were surrounded by fish but refused to eat the most abundant food available in a land of scarcity because it was surmised that their forebears had become sickened by a fish borne disease in the remote past and they simply adopted the aversion as a tradition to keep. Numerous streams watered by storms tracking the roaring forties and they would choose an empty stomach over things fishy. </p>
<p>The thought then occurs that those Front Porch Aboriginals such as myself who rail on about the current era&#8217;s Technocratic Sunbeams for Leviathan might simply be dimwitted nostalgics, following some romantic and episodic eccentric urge rendered baseless by current circumstances. But then, we confront the current reminisces over  the Moon launch and recall the pride, wonder and awe of this monumental marriage of America&#8217;s technological acumen with our love of challenge and exploration. The event was simultaneously mystical and coldly rational. Via camera, we walked with the explorer through the dusty antiquity of the blasted lunar landscape as though Columbus might have had an embedded reporter aboard the Santa Maria. We looked back homeward, with the astronauts at a small blue orb of watery life that is our home, rendered almost fragile as it floated in the dark vacuum of Space. At this moment of triumph when we were given our first look at the small orb of life alone in the black void, one would have thought that a union of Faith and Reason might have borne real advances. Unfortunately, while we might have felt the possibility, the mania for the modern continued it&#8217;s confident march and the May Day Parade of the Victorious Technocrat proceeded apace. </p>
<p> Crawford&#8217;s book speaks of the need to temper Technology with Tradition and reinvigorate the love and liberty inherent to craftsmanship. This is not so much a submission to a fear or blind obedience of authority as it is an embrace of the love for a stewarding authority. In one direction lies consigned surrender and in the other lies that marvelous combination of memory and possibility released by the formidable trinity of the mind, hand and spirit.</p>
<p>Aboriginal urges notwithstanding, painted up in white zig-zags and concentric circles while girding for the Jaguar Dance, I enjoy an occasional plane ride in that lounge chair at 35,000 feet as much as the next guy. Don&#8217;t ask me to chose between dirt and a silicon wafer because this is a specious choice made for a vacuum that is not favored with this tiny blue orb, hurtling through space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dod</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/07/the-tacit-dimension-of-shop-class/#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>dod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=4519#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Thank you for an excellent summary of Polanyi as well as offering this most useful lens for reading Crawford.  The importance, even priority, of practice you note in both writers was also recently underlined by the &quot;mastery takes 10,000 hours of practice&quot; research rehearsed in Gladwell&#039;s &quot;Outliers.&quot;  Your summary also draws much-needed (in our  reflexively autonomous culture) attention to the necessary and legitimate role of authority and submission to it as part of membership in a vital tradition or community.

In the early 70&#039;s, filled with that era&#039;s ethos of &quot;distrust all authority,&quot; I began the practice of a martial art where, with that attitude, I quickly ran into the brick wall of real authority, mastery, people doing things I couldn&#039;t even SEE much less do without humbly opening my eyes, doing what I was shown and told, in short, submitting to both practice and authority.  All necessary before I could even begin to &quot;know&quot; much less do any of the things I came to learn.  You make it wonderfully clear how both Crawford and Polanyi are very good teachers about such experience and why these lessons are so important.  Again, my thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Thank you for an excellent summary of Polanyi as well as offering this most useful lens for reading Crawford.  The importance, even priority, of practice you note in both writers was also recently underlined by the &#8220;mastery takes 10,000 hours of practice&#8221; research rehearsed in Gladwell&#8217;s &#8220;Outliers.&#8221;  Your summary also draws much-needed (in our  reflexively autonomous culture) attention to the necessary and legitimate role of authority and submission to it as part of membership in a vital tradition or community.</p>
<p>In the early 70&#8242;s, filled with that era&#8217;s ethos of &#8220;distrust all authority,&#8221; I began the practice of a martial art where, with that attitude, I quickly ran into the brick wall of real authority, mastery, people doing things I couldn&#8217;t even SEE much less do without humbly opening my eyes, doing what I was shown and told, in short, submitting to both practice and authority.  All necessary before I could even begin to &#8220;know&#8221; much less do any of the things I came to learn.  You make it wonderfully clear how both Crawford and Polanyi are very good teachers about such experience and why these lessons are so important.  Again, my thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An FPR Symposium: Shop Class as Soul Craft, by Matthew Crawford &#124; Front Porch Republic</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/07/the-tacit-dimension-of-shop-class/#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>An FPR Symposium: Shop Class as Soul Craft, by Matthew Crawford &#124; Front Porch Republic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=4519#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>[...] Posts: Mark Mitchell and Conor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posts: Mark Mitchell and Conor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

