<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Reagan Conservative?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/</link>
	<description>Place. Limits. Liberty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The First Rule Of The Conservative Movement Is That Everyone Gets Read Out Of The Conservative Movement, Eventually &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/#comment-11590</link>
		<dc:creator>The First Rule Of The Conservative Movement Is That Everyone Gets Read Out Of The Conservative Movement, Eventually &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=5403#comment-11590</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark T. Mitchell at Front Porch Republic (look at the comments there, too). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark T. Mitchell at Front Porch Republic (look at the comments there, too). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.E. Franks</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/#comment-10886</link>
		<dc:creator>B.E. Franks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=5403#comment-10886</guid>
		<description>Kent, 

If you look around a bit more you&#039;ll see pretty quickly that this is not a &quot;conservative&quot; blog (at least not in a political sense.)  I&#039;ll leave your other comments to more capable minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent, </p>
<p>If you look around a bit more you&#8217;ll see pretty quickly that this is not a &#8220;conservative&#8221; blog (at least not in a political sense.)  I&#8217;ll leave your other comments to more capable minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent J</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/#comment-10843</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=5403#comment-10843</guid>
		<description>So.. the problem with the republican part in general is this.

They say some nice things.. but don&#039;t live them out.

I didnt read the article.. don&#039;t intend to. I liked what Reagan said. So i voted for him. I would any day.

Do i want better politicians, more conservative who actually DO what they say? Yes.

Please.. write an article about how to fix the problem.

I will take Reagan over Obama any day. Period.

I do not find any of you bloggers or so called conservative writers actually solving any of the problems we have... and here is what we nedd to figure out.


its simple.

are you holding your breath?

We need to find out how to convince 10% of the moderates that we really DO need to cut the federal government by huge LOPS. By 10 percent a year for 10 years.

We need to find a hot button of the middle of the road people , the swing vote, 

Stop preaching to the choir. 
Stop wasting your time in conservative blogs.... start trying new thigns to convince these IDIOTS that we are walking on the road to socialism.

have a nice day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So.. the problem with the republican part in general is this.</p>
<p>They say some nice things.. but don&#8217;t live them out.</p>
<p>I didnt read the article.. don&#8217;t intend to. I liked what Reagan said. So i voted for him. I would any day.</p>
<p>Do i want better politicians, more conservative who actually DO what they say? Yes.</p>
<p>Please.. write an article about how to fix the problem.</p>
<p>I will take Reagan over Obama any day. Period.</p>
<p>I do not find any of you bloggers or so called conservative writers actually solving any of the problems we have&#8230; and here is what we nedd to figure out.</p>
<p>its simple.</p>
<p>are you holding your breath?</p>
<p>We need to find out how to convince 10% of the moderates that we really DO need to cut the federal government by huge LOPS. By 10 percent a year for 10 years.</p>
<p>We need to find a hot button of the middle of the road people , the swing vote, </p>
<p>Stop preaching to the choir.<br />
Stop wasting your time in conservative blogs&#8230;. start trying new thigns to convince these IDIOTS that we are walking on the road to socialism.</p>
<p>have a nice day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/#comment-10839</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=5403#comment-10839</guid>
		<description>The question is similar to the question of whether Nestorius was a Nestorian. The answer is pretty clearly no but if you say so no one will believe you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is similar to the question of whether Nestorius was a Nestorian. The answer is pretty clearly no but if you say so no one will believe you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Médaille</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/#comment-10786</link>
		<dc:creator>John Médaille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=5403#comment-10786</guid>
		<description>It is just one of the many myths of the Reagan years that the tax cuts actually increased revenues. No, they decreased revenues, or at least that is the conclusion of the Bush Treasury dept. (see http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a67eed12-88ea-11de-b50f-00144feabdc0.html) Reagan increased revenues the old fashioned way: by raising taxes. Or rather, by shifting them, from the upper to the middle and lower classes, and forward to the next generation. So much for &quot;family values.&quot; He changed the tax laws practically every year in office (none major bills in all) yet still managed to triple the federal deficit, no mean feat. 

It is a great irony that there was more genuine conservatism in Carter&#039;s so-called &quot;malaise speech&quot; with its denunciation of a culture of consumerism.

Many of the current ills of the economy trace themselves to the Reagan era, ills such as the finacialization of the economy, mindless &quot;free trade&quot;, and the &quot;deficits don&#039;t matter&quot; mentality.

Conservative? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is just one of the many myths of the Reagan years that the tax cuts actually increased revenues. No, they decreased revenues, or at least that is the conclusion of the Bush Treasury dept. (see <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a67eed12-88ea-11de-b50f-00144feabdc0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a67eed12-88ea-11de-b50f-00144feabdc0.html</a>) Reagan increased revenues the old fashioned way: by raising taxes. Or rather, by shifting them, from the upper to the middle and lower classes, and forward to the next generation. So much for &#8220;family values.&#8221; He changed the tax laws practically every year in office (none major bills in all) yet still managed to triple the federal deficit, no mean feat. </p>
<p>It is a great irony that there was more genuine conservatism in Carter&#8217;s so-called &#8220;malaise speech&#8221; with its denunciation of a culture of consumerism.</p>
<p>Many of the current ills of the economy trace themselves to the Reagan era, ills such as the finacialization of the economy, mindless &#8220;free trade&#8221;, and the &#8220;deficits don&#8217;t matter&#8221; mentality.</p>
<p>Conservative? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.W. Sabin</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/#comment-10632</link>
		<dc:creator>D.W. Sabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=5403#comment-10632</guid>
		<description>Those espousing a kind of New Reagan Revolution are doomed to continuing the ongoing farrago because they still....despite mountains of evidence...have not quite recognized the cult of personality locking the American Political System into a Stockholm Syndrome Seminar during a Weekend at Bernies.

Much is said and everyone has a swell time but the Host is Dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those espousing a kind of New Reagan Revolution are doomed to continuing the ongoing farrago because they still&#8230;.despite mountains of evidence&#8230;have not quite recognized the cult of personality locking the American Political System into a Stockholm Syndrome Seminar during a Weekend at Bernies.</p>
<p>Much is said and everyone has a swell time but the Host is Dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Cheeks</title>
		<link>http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/08/was-reagan-conservative/#comment-10572</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cheeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=5403#comment-10572</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Thanks for posting this. Dr. Gamble is a favorite and his essay was well rendered. One quibble re: his critique of RR&#039;s &#039;conservatism.&#039; On the economic question related to RR&#039;s tax &#039;cuts&#039; and gummint spending. The truth is RR&#039;s cuts resulted in a doubling of gummint&#039;s annual income. The problem is spending increased. The GOP always blamed the Dems but here, if Ron really had been a conservative, he&#039;d have blocked their spending legislation and made a war. After all he had public opinion on his side and he was the Great Communicator.
I liked Ron, he showed us we don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; Commie-Dems and that they were vulnerable but man, did we miss an opportunity to return to the principles of the old republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Thanks for posting this. Dr. Gamble is a favorite and his essay was well rendered. One quibble re: his critique of RR&#8217;s &#8216;conservatism.&#8217; On the economic question related to RR&#8217;s tax &#8216;cuts&#8217; and gummint spending. The truth is RR&#8217;s cuts resulted in a doubling of gummint&#8217;s annual income. The problem is spending increased. The GOP always blamed the Dems but here, if Ron really had been a conservative, he&#8217;d have blocked their spending legislation and made a war. After all he had public opinion on his side and he was the Great Communicator.<br />
I liked Ron, he showed us we don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; Commie-Dems and that they were vulnerable but man, did we miss an opportunity to return to the principles of the old republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

