Russell Arben Fox Home » Politics & Power, Short

Ah, Let the Courts Do it

By Russell Arben Fox 9 November 2009 One Comment  

In the continuing argument over what should or shouldn’t be the responsibility of the government–and what government, whether local or state or national, should be responsible for it–there is, I think (or, at least, I hope) one thing most of those engaged in this argument can agree upon: that as much as possible, these are decisions to be made actual voters and/or their representatives, not by various bureacratic and/or judicial elites. Americans, as a whole, tend to be pretty good at sniffing out bureaucracies which expand their power (a good habit, since they do it all the time), but many of us, unfortunately, have become much less suspicious of courts doing the same thing. Indeed, for a very long time now, turning to the judiciary to get some policy complaint of yours turned into a “right,” then resolved by constitutional edict one way or another, has been something of an American tradition. And unfortunately, it looks like a lot of Kansas school districts are getting ready to continue it.

Well, I don’t like it, and say why here. Feel free to read the whole thing, but here’s my basic conclusion:

[A]lmost everything having to do education funding, like so many other public policy issues, has both good and bad arguments behind, requiring compromising and continual tweaking. To keep such tweaking in the hands of legislators–and thereby, ultimately, in the hands of voters–is the proper way to run a representative democracy. Insuring that issues pertaining to fundamental rights are resolved through definitive, even defiant, judicial interventions is one, occasionally necessary thing. But figuring out yearly education budgets? Just not the same thing at all.

Localism can be embraced by different people for different reasons; for me and my house, it’s about democracy. Judicial interventions into the legislative process historically have been, and probably sometimes always will be, necessary supplements to the democratic process. They shouldn’t be replacements of it.

Related posts:

  1. The Problem With Principled Argument Even as he denounces the conservative justices for activism and...
  2. Distracted Achievement Gap The problem is that public schools inherit children who are...
  3. Who Was the Real Winner in the New York 23rd Race? There were several. But this biggest, I think, was: The...
  4. Studies Show the PoMoCons are Wrong Well, at least this is the suggestion of the perceptive...
  5. Welcome to the Plutocracy This will not last. Greed consumes everything, until it finally...

Bookmark and Share  

One Comment »

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Don't like your picture? This is easily fixed -- even Luddites can do it: This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.