Traditionalist Critique of Marx and An Analysis of Hawthorne in ANAMNESIS

by Peter Daniel Haworth on March 6, 2012 · 1 comment <span>Print this article</span> Print this article

in Short

FPR readers will be interested in both (1) K.R. Bolton’s traditionalist Conservative critique of Marx and Ideological-Capitalism and (2) Lee Trepanier’s examination of the use of history in Hawthorne. Both essays can be found in ANAMNESIS, A Journal for the Study of Tradition, Place, and ‘Things Divine.’ Bolton’s critique demonstrates the radically anti-traditionalist motives and aims of Marx, including the many ways he admires how Capitalism destroys tradition and the organic elements of society. Trepanier’s analysis considers how Hawthorne’s development of the allegorical romance genre was a successful attempt to consider timeless “fundamental questions of human nature.” Both essays are well crafted and insightful, and I invite curious readers to enjoy them.

Related posts:

  1. Newman, MacIntyre, Aristotle, and Tradition in ANAMNESIS Those interested in J.H. Newman, Aristotle, and traditional theory will...
  2. New ANAMNESIS Symposium: “Views on Hawthorne, Simms, History, and Progress.” Many FPR readers will enjoy the new symposium, “Views on...
  3. New Web Essay and Poem on ANAMNESIS New web pieces are now available on ANAMNESIS. These include...
  4. March of the Ciceronians A reader asks: anyone interested in joining the Ciceronian Society,...
  5. New Academic Journal and Call for Papers: ANAMNESIS, A Journal for the Study of Tradition, Place, and ‘Things Divine.’ This new academic journal will address many themes central to...

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

avatar JA March 6, 2012 at 10:56 pm

The Bolton piece on Marx was quite enjoyable. For a parallel anthropological perspective, David Graeber makes a similar critique of Marx in “Turning Modes of Production Inside Out: Or, Why Capitalism is a Transformation of Slavery.” He argues that, like the capitalism of his day, Marx treats material production as an abstraction of value unconnected to the production of flourishing persons. This abstraction is a modern conceit that the ancients (and non-Western peoples) would consider the subordination of moral and human ends to instrumentality–an arrangement that he rejects, siding with the ancients over the moderns.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: