City of Dreams By John Médaille - May 2, 2011 4 FacebookTwitterEmailPrint Imagine designing a city for people rather than cars: Curitiba, Brazil RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR The Nightstand Parishes Need Pastor-Readers The Stump On College, Careers, and Aspirations for Home The Blackboard Forgetting vs. Overcoming: Nietzche on Abuses of History and the 1619 Project The Nightstand Atoms and the Void: A Review of Interventions 2020 The Barbershop The Sower and the English Instructor: A Hobbit Roadside Colloquy The Blackboard Diversity, Race, and Radical Hospitality in a Bible-based Community 4 COMMENTS Have you or anyone else at FPR read A Pattern Language by Christopher Alexander? After glancing through it (my husband is reading it now), I wondered why I haven’t heard more about Alexander, even in passing, from my agrarian/small is beautiful sources (online and print). He suggests parking lots should be no more than 9% of a town. We live in one of those Midwest, formerly industrial cities that converted miles and miles of farmland into big box stores and even bigger parking lots. A few years ago there was flooding in an older (poorer) neighborhoods, 5 miles from the new developments. Blocks and blocks were condemned as uninhabitable. Apparently, in the rush to bring “business” to this city, and money to the pockets of our local developer (“Paving the Planet” used to be this developer’s slogan), they forgot to responsibly redirect the water flow. Very impressive city planning. Christopher Alexander has been largely ignored because he deals in the manifold details of craftsmanship , proportion and scale instead of the idolatry of modern “it” architecture. He demands hard slogging and this generation likes fireworks. http://www.citiesforpeople.net/cities/bogota.html The Bogota project was inspired by what happened in Curitiba. The episode about Bogota itself: http://www.hulu.com/watch/67737/design-e2-bogot%C3%A1-building-a-sustainable-city#s-p1-so-i0 The most inspiring part of the whole project is the concern for genuine human flourishing. They understand that people need organic community, space, and beauty in their lives. They also understand that government is capable of–and obligated to–increase the quality of life for everyone, especially the poor, but in a manner that is consistent with human dignity. Comments are closed.